Publishing negative results

NPR’s Morning Edition ran a story this morning about how scientific research (including social sciences) may suffer from bias. The point of the argument, however, was really about publication bias and academic journals who prefer to publish positive results over negative ones, though the negative results may be just as important (or more!) than those often published.

Studies were conducted and left unpublished because they failed to support positive hypotheses. How important is it to publish both kinds of results? What percentage of articles feature positive or negative results in your field’s journals? Is the figure skewed one way or the other?

Catch the report here: http://www.npr.org/2015/01/28/382056490/studies-critical-of-bilingual-benefits-often-shelved-because-of-bias

tb

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: